From what I can see, Mr. Guimond, you have done the lion's share of detective work on this case. Stearns doesn't want to touch it, it seems. I wonder why that is. It looks to me like the university has very strong ties within the community. I listened to the interview on "A Closer Look" and it was very troubling. Some of us seemed to know right away what probably happened to Josh -- and yet --the sheriff could not discern that? The best time for evidence collection would have been as soon as it was discovered Josh was missing. *All* of the campus buildings should have been checked immediately, and every person associated with Josh should have been questioned right away. Valuable time was lost. We all knew he was not in any of those rivers. But at least that was officially ruled out, and the Trident team told the sheriff's dept. to pursue another path in searching for Josh. I think the reason people may be afraid about stepping forward is because they fear retaliation of some sort. What they don't understand is that we're all watching, observing, researching, listening, paying attention. From what I have read and know about Joshua, he would go to any distance to find out what happened to a missing friend or loved one. Every one of his friends should be willing to do this for him too
|
