BMW, thank you. I have often wondered if it is too much to hope that another investigative unit has involved itself in Joshua's case. Your point is well taken -- certain agencies would be tough to impossible to push around. It is unfortunate that Stearns investigators have come across as being marginally motivated to dig deep into this case for resolution. We know it is a complicated case. We know it would take top notch detective work to get to the bottom of it. What I did not count on was the unwillingness of others to get involved. I ascribe this unwillingness to a fear factor. Further, if there is a sense that Stearns isn't going to pass the info along to anyone, potential witnesses may feel less inclined to communicate with them. BMW did you ever listen to that "Closer Look" radio interview that discussed Joshua's abduction? It referenced some of the "layers"...and was where I got the idea (incorrectly I hope) that there was some sort of collusion going on...which further led me to conclude that the only people who will get this case solved are right here on this board, starting with Mr. Guimond. I can't help but have the sense someone reading this board has information but just can't bring themselves to come forward. I think witnesses may fear some sort of retribution -- and would be they be wrong to fear that, in your opinion BMW? Thank you for not abandoning Joshua's case.
|
