Home | Message Board Home


 
 
Back
 
12/2/07
 
DoubleDash
 
My first response did not post so I am going to try again. Mr. Guimond, many of us have long wondered why people charged with handling this investigation immediately turned their attention away from what is right in front of them. The grounds and lakes were searched, Josh's friends were interviewed, his computer was examined, his credit cards have been checked, but here is a crucial question I have: Were the staff members on any kind of "restricted" status at this school (a) thoroughly interviewed and (b) had their alibis for the evening Josh went missing corroborated? A young resident on a college campus turns up missing. There are known sex offenders on the campus. These are two irrefutable facts. Was a potential link between these two incontrovertible facts thoroughly and completely examined? Or, were the efforts employed to search for Josh supposed to pass as a complete investigation? It was anything but complete; it was far from complete. If the missing young man had been the sheriff's son, or the governor's son -- how much more exhaustive would this search have been? I can tell you -- a hell of a lot more exhaustive than what was done for Josh. It is a travesty of justice and a complete failure of law enforcement to not have given Joshua the benefit of every investigative technique available to find him. And to the person who did this, you can own up to your crime here on earth, or you can wait until the Lord holds you accountable for it. Either way, we won't stop until we find the truth. And to all the people who looked the other way, instead of having the courage to do the right thing, what goes around, comes around. Remember that.
 
 
Back
 
 
     
 

Contact Us